Skip to content
Independent money guidance
Clear Money Guide
Start here
Menu

The Beneficiary Mistakes That Cost the Most (2026)

Clear Money Guide

What this guide covers

A quick view of the questions and evidence developed below.

In order of damage
The audit that prevents most of them
Sources
Related

Comparison tables scroll horizontally on smaller screens.

Updated July 28, 2026. Quick answer: Ranked by cost rather than frequency: naming the estate or leaving the form blank, a stale ex-spouse, splitting “equally” by balance across accounts with different tax character, and assuming the will controls.

In order of damage

MistakeWhat it costs
Blank form or estate namedFive-year emptying instead of ten, probate, lost protections
Stale ex-spouseThe entire account, to the wrong person
No contingent beneficiaryDefaults to the estate; disclaimer planning becomes impossible
Equalising by balanceSubstantially unequal after tax
Leaving the IRA to children and the brokerage to charityWastes the step-up and hands heirs the taxable asset
Assuming the will controlsThe designation wins; the will is irrelevant here

Get the inherited-account decision right the first time

Deciding when to take money out of an inherited account is a tax question as much as a rules question, and an adviser can price the withdrawal schedule against the rest of your income before a deadline sets the timing for you.

Before you start, what actually happens. The form is run by Kapitalwise, our advisor-matching partner. Kapitalwise sends your details to advisers who pay for the introduction, so expect calls and texts. Clear Money Guide is paid when you submit the form, whether or not you ever hire anyone. This is free to you and there is no obligation to hire anyone.

The Kapitalwise form opens here. You stay on this page.

What happens when you press the button

It asks about nine questions (age, investable assets, location), then your name, email and phone number, and verifies the phone by text. Nothing loads and nothing reaches Kapitalwise until you press the button. Submitting the form does not guarantee an adviser or a match. This matching form is not tax or legal advice.

The audit that prevents most of them

  1. Request the current designation, in writing, from every custodian.
  2. Confirm both primary and contingent are named on each.
  3. Check per stirpes versus per capita reflects your actual intent.
  4. Compare after-tax value across accounts, not balances.
  5. Repeat after any marriage, divorce, birth, death or account transfer.

Every item on that list is free and takes an afternoon. Between them they prevent most of the expensive outcomes described across this cluster — which is unusual in tax, where most improvements cost something.

Sources

SECURE Act (2019); SECURE 2.0 (2022); final RMD regulations published 19 July 2024; IRC §401(a)(9); IRC §1014 (basis of property acquired from a decedent); IRC §664 (charitable remainder trusts). Cross-checked July 2026 against professional analyses from Kitces, Grant Thornton, Ascensus, Charles Schwab and Kiplinger. Indexed figures and state-specific rules are flagged rather than asserted.

This states what the cited authority says. It is not tax or legal advice, and beneficiary planning turns on family facts and state law that no page can see.

Related

The same audit applied to a life insurance policy has a trap the retirement accounts do not: a policy has an owner, an insured and a beneficiary, and when those are three different people the payout can be treated as a taxable gift from the owner to the beneficiary.

See whether an adviser match is worth comparing