Updated August 6, 2026. Quick answer: no. A will that was validly executed where you signed it is generally still valid after you move — that is written into the statutes, not just assumed. What moving actually breaks is smaller and sharper: a handwritten will can stop being recognised, the executor you named can become ineligible, the self-proving affidavit can stop doing its job, and in nine states your property itself is characterised differently. None of those is fixed by panicking about validity.
The rule that saves your will
Uniform Probate Code states carry a choice-of-law section written for exactly this. Minnesota’s reads in full: “A will is valid if executed in compliance with section 524.2-502 or if its execution complies with the law at the time of execution of the place where the testator executes the will, or of the law of the place where at the time of execution or at the time of death the testator is domiciled, has a place of abode, or is a national.” (Minn. Stat. §524.2-506.) Four independent ways to be valid, and the will only needs one of them.
Non-UPC states usually reach the same place. Florida: “Any will, other than a holographic or nuncupative will, executed by a nonresident of Florida, either before or after this law takes effect, is valid as a will in this state if valid under the laws of the state or country where the will was executed.” (Fla. Stat. §732.502(2).)
Read that Florida sentence twice, because the exception is the whole story.
What actually breaks
1. A handwritten will, when you move somewhere that does not take them. Florida’s carve-out excludes holographic wills from the rule that saves out-of-state wills, and then closes the obvious workaround: “A will in the testator’s handwriting that has been executed in accordance with subsection (1) shall not be considered a holographic will.” A will handwritten and unwitnessed in a state that recognises them — perfectly valid there — can therefore be worth nothing in Florida. Which states recognise handwritten wills at all is a state-by-state question with the statute cited, and this is the single strongest reason to re-execute after an interstate move.
2. Your executor can become ineligible. Florida again: “A person who is not domiciled in the state cannot qualify as personal representative unless the person is” an adopted child or adoptive parent, related by lineal consanguinity, a spouse, sibling, uncle, aunt, nephew or niece (or someone related by lineal consanguinity to one of those), or the spouse of a qualifying person (Fla. Stat. §733.304). Your will is fine. Your best friend from the old state cannot serve. Several states have some version of this and some require a resident agent instead.
3. The self-proving affidavit may not travel well. The affidavit is what lets the court admit the will without hunting down your witnesses years later. States differ on whether one exists at all, what wording it needs, and whether a notary is required — California, for instance, has no execution-time self-proving affidavit in the sense most states mean. If the affidavit does not work in the new state, the will is still valid; proving it just becomes slower and more expensive for whoever is left doing it. The requirements are in our execution library, and the notary question is here.
4. Marital property is characterised differently in nine states, and moving changes the characterisation. California defines “quasi-community property” as, in essence, property acquired while domiciled elsewhere “that would have been the community property of the decedent and the surviving spouse if the decedent had been domiciled in this state at the time of its acquisition” (Cal. Prob. Code §66). Move from a common-law state to California and your separately-titled assets can be treated as if they had been community property all along, for the purposes that matter at death. The tax side moves too: community property can step up in full at the first death, while a common-law state steps up only the decedent’s half. That is a basis difference measured in real money, and it is invisible in the will.
5. What does not break: witness count. This is the fear people arrive with, and the choice-of-law rules above are what answer it. A two-witness will signed in a state requiring two is not retroactively defective because you moved somewhere that also requires two, or three, or one.
So when should you actually redo it
Re-execute in the new state if any of these is true: the will is handwritten or otherwise unwitnessed; your named executor is now out of state; you moved into or out of a community-property state; or the will was drafted around a specific state’s rules (elective share, homestead, a trust designed for the old state’s tax). Otherwise the honest answer is that re-executing is optional, and the higher-value job is the one on the other side of the move.
That job is not the will at all. It is domicile itself — the thing that decides which state taxes your income, which state’s estate tax you face, and which state’s probate court opens your estate. Start at how domicile is actually established and proved, and what the move does to your tax picture.
Re-execute your will at LawDepot
That is a sponsored link and it is marked as one. It is the only ask on this page and it did not change a word above it. See our affiliate disclosure.
One more thing, if you kept the old house
Owning real property in two states is a separate problem from validity, and it survives a perfectly drafted will: the second state generally opens its own ancillary proceeding for the real estate there. That is a second court, a second filing fee, and often a second lawyer — estimate what the second proceeding costs, and note that a transfer-on-death deed is the usual way people take that property out of probate entirely, where the state allows one.
Sources, and what we did not verify
Minn. Stat. §524.2-506 (choice of law as to execution), read at the Minnesota Office of the Revisor of Statutes on 2026-08-06. Fla. Stat. §732.502 (execution of wills, including the nonresident and holographic provisions in subsection (2)) and §733.304 (nonresidents), read at the Florida Senate the same day. Cal. Prob. Code §66 (quasi-community property), read at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov the same day.
What we did not verify: we did not read all 51 choice-of-law statutes today. Minnesota is quoted as the Uniform Probate Code pattern and Florida as a non-UPC state that reaches a similar result with a sharper exception; a handful of states differ in ways that matter, and the executor-eligibility rules in particular vary far more than the validity rules do. Check your new state before assuming its executor rule is Florida’s.
See methodology, editorial policy and corrections. General information about how these statutes read, not legal advice for your estate — probate codes are amended every session and the read date above is what you are relying on.