What If You Run Out of Money in a CCRC?

Updated August 21, 2026. Quick answer: it depends on which contract you signed, and in California that is settled in statute rather than left to a board. Under a life care contract a resident who becomes financially unable to pay “shall be subsidized” — an obligation, not a kindness — though not if the need was created by giving assets away. Under any other continuing care contract a subsidy is optional, and where one is granted the contract may state that the provider’s decision is “final and conclusive”. Find out which sentence is in your agreement.

What a CCRC is, and what the letters mean

A CCRC is a continuing care retirement community — increasingly marketed as a life plan community, which is the same product under a newer name. What makes it one is not the campus or the amenities but the continuing care contract: California defines the underlying promise as a promise, expressed or implied, by a provider to provide one or more elements of care to an elderly resident for the duration of his or her life or for a term in excess of one year (Cal. Health & Safety Code § 1771(c)(9)). A community offering only a monthly rent and no such promise is senior housing, however similar the brochure looks.

You generally pay in two parts: an entrance fee up front and a monthly care fee thereafter. California draws the line between them with a number: “An initial, amortized, or deferred transfer of consideration that is greater in value than 12 times the monthly care fee shall be presumed to be an entrance fee.” (§ 1771(e)(3)). That test matters because the entrance fee is the part that may be refundable, may be partly deductible, and may count against Medicaid eligibility.

What this page does not publish: a national entrance-fee or monthly-fee figure. Entrance fees vary by community, region, unit and refund structure, and no national dataset was reachable at primary source this session — the GAO report server returned 403 and the California department’s continuing-care page returned 503. Rather than repeat a range we could not open, we publish none. For the care levels that are covered by a survey we have read, see senior living costs by care level, where each figure is year-labelled and attributed.

The distinction that decides it

In California the two promises are not merely different in tone — they sit in different subdivisions of the same statute, and one of them uses the word shall.

A life care contract must carry the subsidy. The definition itself requires it: “A life care contract shall also include provisions to subsidize residents who become financially unable to pay their monthly care fees.” (Cal. Health & Safety Code § 1771(l)). The contract-contents section says the same thing operationally: “A resident who becomes financially unable to pay his or her monthly care fees shall be subsidized provided the resident’s financial need does not arise from action by the resident to divest the resident of his or her assets.” (§ 1788(b)(5)). Back in § 1771(l), the definition also fixes the price of care: “A change shall not be made in the monthly fee based on level of care.” — and § 1788(b)(4) requires the contract itself to say so: “Monthly care fees will not be changed based on the resident’s level of care or service.” So moving to skilled nursing under a life care contract does not, by itself, raise your monthly fee.

Note the condition, because it is a planning trap. The subsidy is owed only where the need “does not arise from action by the resident to divest the resident of his or her assets.” Giving money away to become eligible for help is the one route that can forfeit it.

Every other contract type: permitted, not required. Section 1788(c) lists what continuing care contracts may include, and subsidising a resident who later cannot pay is item (c)(1) on that permissive list. Where a contract does grant one, the statute expressly allows it to add that “The provider’s decision shall be final and conclusive regarding any adjustments to be made or any action to be taken regarding any charitable consideration extended to any of its residents.” (§ 1788(c)(1)(B)). It may also let the provider recover the cost out of property you acquire later or failed to disclose (§ 1788(c)(1)(C)), and offset any refund due at termination by whatever subsidy you received (§ 1788(c)(1)(G)).

So the question is not whether the community is generous. It is which of those two subdivisions your agreement was written under. One gives you a right with a condition. The other gives the provider a discretion the statute itself calls final.

The limits of this, stated plainly: every sentence above is California law. Continuing-care statutes are state law and the subsidy rule is not uniform — read your own state’s continuing-care act before assuming it. And California settles what the contract must say; it does not standardise a separately-marketed benevolent or resident-assistance fund, which is why the fund questions below still matter.

The three contract types, briefly

The industry labels are Type A (life care / extensive), Type B (modified) and Type C (fee-for-service). Type A bundles higher-level care into the entrance fee and a stable monthly fee; Type B includes a capped allotment of care and charges beyond it; Type C prices independent living only and bills care at prevailing rates as you use it. The letters are industry shorthand, not statute, and two communities can use the same letter to mean different things — which is exactly why the subdivision your contract was drafted under matters more than the letter on the brochure. How Types A, B and C allocate the risk.

What to ask for, and the exact question

The clause in the individual signed residency agreement - not the brochure - saying what happens if funds are exhausted, and whether continued care is an enumerated contractual right, expressly contingent on a fund balance or board discretion, or simply unaddressed. Also the most recent audited financial statement and reserve report. For anything marketed as 'life care', confirm the duration-of-life language appears in the signed contract.

Phrase the question so it cannot be answered warmly: “If I exhaust my assets in year twelve, which clause of this agreement obliges you to keep me, and what are its conditions?” A contractual right has a clause number. A policy does not.

What a benevolent fund is and is not

Some operators, often nonprofit, maintain a pool - a resident assistance fund, benevolent fund or similar - funded by charitable gifts, a share of entrance fees, or operating surplus, intended to subsidise fees for residents who outlive their resources.

Many are real, well funded, and used exactly as intended. The issue is not that they are hollow. It is that a fund is a pool with a balance and a committee, and a contract term is an obligation — and only one of them survives a bad decade for the operator, which is precisely the decade in which you would need it.

Ask what the fund holds, how it is funded, how many residents it currently supports, and whether anyone has been asked to leave for inability to pay.

Where Medicaid does and does not fit

Medicaid does not pay CCRC entrance fees or ordinary independent-living or assisted-living housing and amenity charges. Where a community's skilled-nursing component is itself separately licensed and Medicaid-certified, Medicaid can pay for care delivered in that component once the resident is medically and financially eligible.

The CFR and CMS citations for that last point could not be re-loaded this session (ecfr.gov redirected to a bot check, Medicaid.gov returned 403), so it rests on general programme architecture rather than a citation read today.

And a trap specific to this decision: a refundable entrance fee may be counted as an available resource for Medicaid eligibility. The statute sets three conditions and all three must be met together, under 42 U.S.C. § 1396p(g)(2) — the fee can be used to pay for your care, you are eligible for a refund on death or departure, and it confers no ownership interest. Which refund structure you have therefore affects more than your estate.

All three conditions must be satisfied together for the entrance fee to count as an available resource. If any one fails - for instance a fully non-refundable fee that returns nothing on death or departure - the fee is not treated as an available resource under this provision.

Related: what your state recovers after death · what a trust does and does not do here.

Sponsored advisor-matching link. We may earn compensation if you submit the third-party form. Compare fees, scope, conflicts, credentials and fiduciary duty before hiring. Affiliate Disclosure.

General information drawn from IRS, Medicare, HUD and state statute and regulation, not legal, tax or financial advice. Continuing-care law is state law and differs materially between states; every figure here is year-labelled and every source named so you can check it against your own contract. Read your own signed agreement before relying on any general description, including this one.