Clear Money Guide
Start with the tool
Open the inputs first, then use the guide outline to check assumptions and sources.
Updated July 30, 2026. Quick answer (2026): Enter balances by account type, this year’s spending need, and your own rates. The tool ranks taxable against tax-deferred by real marginal cost, takes any RMD first because it is mandatory, and places Roth last on purpose. One year, deterministic, no forecast.
Withdrawal order for this year
You have this year's order. The multi-year version is the hard part.
This tool answers one year on purpose. Sequencing across a whole retirement — with conversions, RMDs and IRMAA thresholds interacting — is where the real money is, and it is not something a single-page calculator should pretend to solve.
If your portfolio is $250,000 or more, this connects you — free, with no obligation to hire anyone — with 2 to 3 vetted advisors.
Before you start, what actually happens. The matching service is run by WiserAdvisor, an independent advisor-matching company. It opens on their site, asks for your ZIP code and a few questions, and matches you with 2 to 3 vetted advisors. It is free to you.
WiserAdvisor states the service is built for portfolios of $250,000 and above, and this is aimed at readers with retirement accounts at that scale. By submitting you consent to emails, phone calls and text messages from WiserAdvisor and up to three advisors, so expect to be contacted. Clear Money Guide is paid when you complete the form, whether or not you ever hire anyone.
Compare fees, scope, conflicts, credentials and fiduciary duty before you hire anyone. This is not the only way to find an adviser.
Opens on WiserAdvisor’s site in a new tab.
What this tool does, and what it refuses to do
It compares the marginal tax cost of one more dollar from each account type this year, and orders your withdrawals accordingly. It does not project returns, future tax brackets, or a lifetime drawdown path.
That restraint is deliberate. A multi-year optimiser's answer is driven by return assumptions, future bracket assumptions and longevity — none of which anyone knows — and presenting that stack of guesses as a recommendation is false precision. A single-year marginal comparison is something you can check by hand.
The four sources, and what each one really costs
- RMD: ordinary income, and not optional. It is taken first because the law requires it, not because it is cheap.
- Taxable brokerage: only the gain portion is taxed, at your capital gain rate. A dollar withdrawn from an account with a 40% embedded gain and a 15% rate costs 6 cents.
- Tax-deferred: every dollar is ordinary income at your marginal rate.
- Roth: zero tax today.
Why Roth is pinned last, even though it is free
If you rank purely by this year's cost, Roth wins outright and the tool drains it first. That is arithmetically correct and financially indefensible — it spends the only asset whose growth is permanently tax-free to save a few thousand dollars now. The order here ranks taxable against tax-deferred on genuine marginal cost and holds Roth in reserve regardless.
Where the default flips
Taxable-first is not a law. With a high embedded gain and a low ordinary bracket, the taxable account is the expensive one: a 95% gain at a 20% capital gain rate costs 19 cents per dollar, more than a 12% ordinary bracket. The calculator checks this rather than assuming, which is the main reason to use it instead of a rule of thumb.
Related
- Taxable first withdrawal myth
- Why roth comes last in withdrawal order
- Withdrawal order with rmds started
- Withdrawal order and irmaa brackets
Methodology
- This is a single-year, deterministic comparison of the marginal tax cost of one more dollar from each account type. It does not project returns, future brackets, or a lifetime drawdown path, because those depend on assumptions no calculator can verify.
- Every rate is a USER INPUT. Ordinary brackets, long-term capital gain brackets and IRMAA tiers are all indexed annually, so none of them is hardcoded anywhere in this cluster.
- A required minimum distribution is taken first because it is mandatory, not because it is cheapest. Roth is placed last regardless of the single-year arithmetic, which would otherwise drain it first.
- Figures were computed by two independently written engines that agree to the cent, with invariants asserting RMD-first ordering, Roth-last ordering, and that a shortfall is reported rather than silently satisfied.
- Federal only, and excludes state tax, the taxation of Social Security benefits, and ACA premium credits.
Educational estimate, not tax advice. Confirm anything that changes a filing or distribution decision with a CPA.
Editorial standards: Editorial Policy
One more case: a low-income year flips the default order — that is the year to draw tax-deferred dollars or convert, not to spend taxable first.
Guides › Retirement Withdrawals
Nobody withholds for you in retirement. Work out your safe-harbour number — 90% of this year or 100% of last year, whichever is lower — and if the year is already off track, withholding from a December RMD counts as paid evenly across all four quarters, which an estimated payment does not.
Thinking about clearing the mortgage first? Run it against your own numbers — including the deduction reality check, since a couple both over 65 has a $35,500 standard deduction in 2026 and most mortgage interest therefore deducts nothing, and the gross-up if the money comes from an IRA.
If the money is in the TSP, the rulebook is its own: the 10% penalty turns on the year you separated, not your age when you withdraw, and that exception does not survive a rollover to an IRA. What keeping it or moving it costs puts the difference in dollars.
For scale, from the Federal Reserve’s own survey data computed in-house: half of households aged 55–64 hold under $16,600 in retirement accounts, while the average is $306,404 — where any balance actually ranks, and why the two numbers differ so violently.
Sequence and order both assume there is something to draw — how long a balance lasts before order even matters.