Updated July 28, 2026. Quick answer: No annual RMDs. A Roth owner never has a required beginning date during life, so the condition that forces years 1–9 withdrawals cannot be met — but the account must still be emptied by the end of year ten.
Why the Roth answer is cleaner
The annual-RMD trap on traditional inherited accounts turns on whether the decedent had reached their required beginning date. A Roth owner has no lifetime RMDs at all, so there is no required beginning date to have reached. The condition simply cannot be satisfied.
That makes the answer for inherited Roths uniform where the traditional answer splits: no annual RMDs, empty by year ten. It is the one place where the common advice is actually correct.
Which makes the strategy the opposite
Because qualified Roth withdrawals are tax-free, there is no rate-smoothing reason to spread them. Leaving the money invested for the full ten years and taking it at the end lets it compound tax-free for as long as the rules allow — the reverse of the usual advice on a traditional inherited account.
Check the account’s own five-year clock. Earnings can be taxable if the Roth was not open long enough, and that clock is the decedent’s, not yours.
Sources
Final regulations on required minimum distributions, published 19 July 2024; SECURE Act (2019) and SECURE 2.0 (2022); IRC §401(a)(9). Cross-checked July 2026 against professional analyses from Kitces, Grant Thornton, Ascensus, Charles Schwab and Kiplinger. Specific IRS notice numbers for the 2021–2024 waivers, and the exact correction window for reducing the missed-RMD excise tax, should be confirmed against primary source before you rely on them.
This states what the cited authority says. It is not tax advice, and inherited account rules turn on facts about the decedent that no page can verify for you.